Mercury SR 90212: Paray's Fantastic Chabrier

Mercury Living Presence SR 90212

Chabrier: Espana, Suite Pastorale, Fete Polonaise, Overture to "Gwendoline", Danse Slave

Paul Paray, conductor
Detroit Symphony Orchestra

Pressing: US, maroon 1st label, colorback

Condition: NM

Date first published: 1961

Stampers: RFR-1/RFR-1

Price range: $28-300 (mean $96) on popsike.com

Comments: A close second behind SR 90313, my all-time top-ranking Mercury Living Presence recording, this is for many music-lovers and collectors one of the finest classical records that Mercury ever released.  From the opening minutes of the first track, you can tell that this is going to be a stunning album.  First, unlike many of the Mercury Living Presence LPs, there is minimal tape hiss (on my pressing at least), and the surfaces are relatively quiet.  Second, the sound is especially natural and blessed with fantastic dynamic range and clarity and a very nice reproduction of the hall acoustics.  Third, and most important, the music is delightful to hear, and Paul Paray and the Detroit Symphony Orchestra truly deliver excellent performances that really captivate the spirit of this French music.

This album is one of the more valuable Mercuries, and interestingly, its reissues by Classic Records have also held legendary status.  I am quite certain that one of the reissues has made it to one of Arthur Salvatore's lists.  I haven't had the opportunity to compare the reissue to the original, but I can say that the original has always held a special place in my collection.  The album was also digitally remastered by Wilma Cozart Fine in the early 1990s and sounds surprisingly good on CD.

I just thought I'd share this passage from the liner notes on the back:

"If no one has yet written extensively about the theory that nationalistic music is enhanced by being played in auditoriums of respective national origin, someone probably will before long.  In these days of extreme recording fidelity, Mercury has proudly admitted that Living Presence recordings reproduce not only the exact sound of the music but the acoustical "presence" of the auditorium as well.  From there it is only a step to inquiring into the question of what kind of auditorium fits particular music best.  And answers to that question bring up other, more speculative questions.

It was while the Mercury classical staff was investigating not only the answers but the questions themselves that the Cass Technical High School auditorium in Detroit, Michigan, was discovered as a potential recording hall.  At first glance it seemed to be perfect -- the right size, well-aged surfaces, full-blown acoustical resonance, an adequate stage for the orchestra.  Tests by the engineers and classical staff revealed that all these qualities were indeed the assets they seemed, and in addition the sound seemed to have a kind of French quality to it.  French music seemed at home in it.  In climaxes it was taut, in pianissimo sections it was sensuous.  It was so good, in fact, that Mercury moved its equipment then and there, and all the Detroit Symphony Orchestra's latest recordings have been done at Cass.  The orchestral music of Chabrier in this album shows the conductor and the orchestra at their best, certainly.  But it also shows the special merits of an important new auditorium in the recording world."

Reminds of the time that we played Chabrier's Espana for our high school orchestra concert in our high school auditorium.  I wonder if the auditorium at Downers Grove North sounded anything like Cass ... I know we didn't sound quite like the Detroit Symphony.



Comments

  1. You have a true Mercury pressing. The original would have been an FR-1 or the like which was pressed by RCA. I don't suppose you have an opinion on the merits of the RFR versus FR pressings?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For certain records in the Mercury catalog (I believe after a certain time), RFR stampers were the earliest pressing. This one is one of them. To my knowledge, no FR pressing exists of this album, so the RFR-1 was the first pressing. SR 90313, another example, only exists in RFR pressings. The earlier Mercuries had FR stampers.

      Delete
    2. Popsike shows these in FR-1. I believe FR-1 was first pressing up through about SR90273, but I am a bit rusty on Mercuries.

      Delete
  2. I have this recording on AMS 16107 with stampers EFR3 & EFR4. This is of course one of the UK EMI pressed series. SQ and performance is excellent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is exactly the question I wanted to ask: how do the UK pressed Mercuries compare to the US ones? There is certain degree of variability in terms of sound quality and pressing quality among the US issues. The best Mercuries are really incredible in sound, like this one and SR 90313, 90006, etc. Many of them, though, are rather mediocre. Almost all of them have this characteristic tape hiss inherent to Mercury recordings. I wonder if these pressing issues would not have been an issue among the UK pressings. I'd really like to do A/B comparisons to figure this out, though fetching some of the AMS over here are not so easy unless I go through Ebay.

      Delete
  3. I only have a few US mercuries but generally the HMV pressed Mercuries are a little less brash than their US counterparts. This seems to divide opinion, as some prefer the warm presentation of the EMI house sound compared to the sonic fireworks you can get from the US versions. Personally I like the EMI sound but that maybe because I don't have US pressings of the finest Mercury releases.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think we all are fans of the EMI sound in general, and a comparison between the UK and US pressings of the Mercuries would be an interesting experiment. While I am curious to see if the UK pressings improved upon the excellence of the finest US Mercury releases, I am actually more interested to know if EMI did anything to improve the quality of the more mediocre sounding US releases.

      Delete
    2. Did EMI do some later pressings of the Mercury stuff or are all of these from the time of the original release (i.e. tube.)

      Delete
    3. I believe they were contemporary with the US releases, but whether there was a delay in release, I'm not certain.

      Delete
  4. Small delay would be nothing. Another concern might be if five or ten years later they put out more with fresh masterings that sound very different.

    AQL,
    Am I correct that Grundmann remastered this for Classic? If so that would be fantastic. Frankly I get a little out of sorts since I don't have either of the hot Charbrier LPs. I recall Tin Ear liking the Jubilee of a Decca release. I believe both of these in the best incarnation are quite expensive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I believe you're right about Grundmann mastering the Classic reissues of the Mercuries, but I'd have to confirm that to be certain.

      Delete
    2. Yes he did, I have both the 33 and 45 on 180g. Most people felt it wasn't quite in the same league as the Stravinsky, Ravel or Prokofiev. I never had an original to compare but among the Classic/Mercury issues, I found it just slightly below the former three.

      Delete
    3. Nice to know. Just did comparison of Love for Three Oranges versus 45 rpm ORG. Grundmann has cleary changed his mastering setup and the ORG has a more focused tube sound than his Classic effort. That being said, the Quadophile sold off his ORG and kept the 33 rpm Classic which scores very high for its sound floor/dynamics. Some may prefer the new ORG as did the buyer of the used ORG who got to hear both on his system (Magnepan with Manely amps.)

      Delete
  5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts